The collective intelligence of sheep is thought to be similar to that of humans in some ways. Both groups are social animals that live in herds and flock together for protection. Both humans and sheep use various forms of communication to interact with each other, including body language, vocalizations, and facial expressions.

However, there are also some significant differences between the two. For instance, human beings have a much more developed prefrontal cortex, which is responsible for higher-order cognitive functions such as planning, decision-making, and self-control. This allows us to think abstractly and solve problems in ways that sheep cannot. Additionally, our culture and language give us a complex system of symbols that we can use to communicate with one another in very specific ways. Sheep lack this level of sophistication in their communication, instead relying on more instinctual cues.

The fluidity of leadership among sheep is surprising because it shows that animals can cooperate in complex ways. Although sheep are not as intelligent as humans, they are able to communicate and coordinate their actions in order to achieve a common goal. This type of collective intelligence is rare in the animal kingdom, and it demonstrates the potential for cooperation among different species.

The way that sheep flocks operate as a type of collective intelligence has implications for human societies in several ways. First, it suggests that humans are not as individually intelligent as we like to think we are. We are heavily reliant on others in our social groups to help us make decisions and guide us through life. Second, the fluidity of the leadership process in sheep flocks suggests that human societies could benefit from being more flexible in their hierarchies and power structures. Rather than having strict, rigid systems in place, perhaps we would be better off if we allowed for more flexibility and change. Finally, the fact that sheep flock leaders are only temporary highlights the importance of succession planning in human organizations. Organizations need to have plans in place for when current leaders retire or step down, so that there is no disruption in the flow of decision-making or guidance.