There are a few key ways in which the collective intelligence of sheep differs from that of humans. For one, sheep tend to be more flexible and adaptable in their decision-making, while humans tend to be more rigid and set in their ways. This is likely due to the fact that sheep live in much smaller social groups than humans, and so they need to be able to change their behaviour quickly in order to survive.

Another key difference is that sheep rely heavily on visual cues when making decisions, while humans rely more on verbal communication. This means that Sheep are much better at following a leader who is moving in the right direction, but it also means that they are more easily confused or led astray if there is no clear leader.

Overall, the collective intelligence of sheep is quite different from that of humans. However, it is still an impressive feat, and it shows how important adaptability and flexibility can be for survival.

Collective intelligence is a relatively new field of study that looks at how groups of individuals can work together to solve problems. The idea is that the collective intelligence of a group is greater than the sum of its parts. This has implications for our understanding of leadership because it suggests that leaders are not necessarily born but can be elected by their peers. This fluidity in leadership is extremely surprising and has major implications for our understanding of how organizations and teams function.

Yes, the type of fluidity seen in sheep flocks could definitely be applied in other areas, such as human organizations. This is because organizations are made up of people, and people are capable of forming collective intelligence. Just like sheep, humans are able to elect temporary leaders to guide them while moving. This type of fluidity allows for a more flexible and adaptable organization that can quickly respond to changes.